accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mario Pastorelli (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-4375) Add missing Key constructors taking array of bytes as argument
Date Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:12:20 GMT
Mario Pastorelli created ACCUMULO-4375:
------------------------------------------

             Summary: Add missing Key constructors taking array of bytes as argument
                 Key: ACCUMULO-4375
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4375
             Project: Accumulo
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: core
            Reporter: Mario Pastorelli


In my company we use {{Key}} built directly from {{byte[]}} instead of {{Text}}. Currently
{{Key}} has many constructors working with {{Text}} and only few working with {{byte[]}}.
You can still use the {{Text}}-based constructor to create a {{Key}} from a {{byte[]}} by
wrapping it into a {{Text}}, but this requires to box a {{byte[]}} into {{Text}} without any
good reason.
I propose to add the missing {{byte[]}}-based {{Key}} constructors, which are:

{code:java}
Key(byte[] row)
Key(byte[] row, long ts)
Key(byte[] row, byte[] cf)
Key(byte[] row, byte[] cf, byte[] cq)
Key(byte[] row, byte[] cf, byte[] cq, byte[] cv)
Key(byte[] row, byte[] cf, byte[] cq, long ts)
Key(byte[] row, byte[] cf, byte[] cq, ColumnVisibility cv, long ts)
{code}

The new constructor should behave like the {{Text}}-based counterpart, for instance:

{code:java}
byte[] row = new byte[] {0};
assertEquals(new Key(row), new Key(new Text(row)));
{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message