Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A766418851 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 06:57:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8756 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2015 06:57:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 8650 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2015 06:57:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 8431 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2015 06:57:11 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 06:57:11 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B702C1F6B for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 06:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 06:57:11 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4069) Services failing to renew Kerberos ticket MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4069?page=3Dcom.atlass= ian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D1= 5037394#comment-15037394 ]=20 ASF GitHub Bot commented on ACCUMULO-4069: ------------------------------------------ GitHub user joshelser opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/57 ACCUMULO-4069 Ensure Kerberos relogins occur on server side and clien= =E2=80=A6 =E2=80=A6t side. =20 Changes for 1.7 and 1.8. If we want to land in 1.6, we'll have to rip o= ut a lot of stuff that just doesn't exist (I think a cherrypick merge -sour= s would just be easier). =20 I know much of this is probably greek. I tried to make lots of good com= ments which describe what's happening and why we need to make these additio= ns. I'd welcome feedback where context is lacking. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/joshelser/accumulo ACCUMULO-4069-krb-rene= wal Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/57.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #57 =20 ---- commit 3d7e874a7d522b0bb398b5848d3f6e941df0b970 Author: Josh Elser Date: 2015-12-03T06:53:27Z ACCUMULO-4069 Ensure Kerberos relogins occur on server side and client = side. ---- > Services failing to renew Kerberos ticket > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-4069 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4069 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Bug > Components: gc, master, monitor, tserver > Affects Versions: 1.5.4, 1.6.4, 1.7.0 > Reporter: Josh Elser > Assignee: Josh Elser > Priority: Blocker > Labels: kerberos > Fix For: 1.6.5, 1.7.1, 1.8.0 > > > Got a report from a user that Accumulo services were dying after a period= of time that was suspiciously similar to the Kerberos ticket lifetime. > A Kerberos ticket lifetime is the amount of time that the ticket is valid= (obtained from password or keytab). There is also a renewable lifetime ass= ociate with each ticket. Within the renewable lifetime duration, clients ca= n "renew" their ticket for another "ticket lifetime" duration. For each, a = lifetime of one day and a renewable lifetime of seven days: a ticket is val= id for one day, but clients can renew that ticket up to 6 days after the or= iginal ticket expires. > I do recall seeing a line of code in our services that has a comment sayi= ng it should spawn a thread specifically for this purpose, but I don't ever= recall seeing that thread in thread dumps. My hunch is that the thread jus= t isn't getting launched and we're not doing renewals -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)