Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jira@apache.org
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:58:27 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Josh Elser (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12902528.1444083976000.38195.1444154307473@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12902528.1444083976000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12902528.1444083976000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12902528.1444083976578@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4019) thrift proxy no longer listening
 on all interfaces
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14945463#comment-14945463 ] 

Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4019:
--------------------------------------

bq. Does anybody know what prompted this change? To fix this, I think we should hardcode it to listen to all interfaces. Would the correct way of doing that be to use the following address?:

I think {{"::"}} is the IPv6 notation for specifying this. {{"0.0.0.0"}} is what you'd see for IPv4.

> thrift proxy no longer listening on all interfaces
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-4019
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4019
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: proxy
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.0
>            Reporter: Adam Fuchs
>
> In updating the thrift proxy to use HostAndPort-style configuration, we changed the behavior from listening on all interfaces to only listening on the canonical host name interface. This broke the proxy for some users:
> {code}
> -    TServer server = createProxyServer(AccumuloProxy.class, ProxyServer.class, port, protoFactoryClass, opts.prop);
> -    server.serve();
> +    HostAndPort address = HostAndPort.fromParts(InetAddress.getLocalHost().getCanonicalHostName(), port);
> +    ServerAddress server = createProxyServer(address, protoFactory, opts.prop);
> {code}
> Does anybody know what prompted this change? To fix this, I think we should hardcode it to listen to all interfaces. Would the correct way of doing that be to use the following address?:
> {code}
> HostAndPort address = HostAndPort.fromParts("::", port);
> {code}


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)