Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 257D318A30 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 02:47:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41704 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2015 02:47:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 41668 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2015 02:47:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 41657 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2015 02:47:04 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 02:47:04 +0000 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 02:47:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Josh Elser (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-3929) Separate performance/timing-sensitive tests from the rest of integration tests MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14611368#comment-14611368 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-3929: -------------------------------------- Of course, I agree. > Separate performance/timing-sensitive tests from the rest of integration tests > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ACCUMULO-3929 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3929 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: test > Reporter: Josh Elser > Fix For: 1.6.4, 1.7.1, 1.8.0 > > > Sometimes in the course of fixing bugs in Accumulo, we want to write tests that are sensitive to certain performance characteristics of the underlying hardware. > These kinds of tests are important in helping us catch regressions, but they're not suitable to run as a normal part of the integration test suite. > We can separate these tests by creating a special Java annotation and the Category support on the [surefire plugin|http://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/junit.html#Using_JUnit_Categories]. > The difficulty will likely be in how we want to run these tests. It should be very straightfoward to _only_ run the performance tests. Maybe more work if we want to be able to run all the normal ITs and these performance tests. Not entirely sure. HBase's top-level pom has some examples of setting up multiple executions of the surefire-plugin. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)