accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eric Newton (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-3888) getActiveScans should not eat TableNotFoundException
Date Mon, 15 Jun 2015 19:59:01 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14586570#comment-14586570
] 

Eric Newton commented on ACCUMULO-3888:
---------------------------------------

Sure, it's [tserver.client.timeout | https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;a=blob;f=core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/conf/Property.java;h=7e10edf8a67d86173739c7a375384fbf86ce690c;hb=refs/heads/master#l228
]


> getActiveScans should not eat TableNotFoundException
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-3888
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3888
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: client
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Assignee: Josh Elser
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.8.0
>
>
> Noticed this awkwardness during integration tests running against a real cluster.
> {noformat}
> org.apache.accumulo.core.client.TableNotFoundException: Table (Id=r) does not exist
>  at org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.Tables.getTableName(Tables.java:128)
>  at org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.ActiveScanImpl.<init>(ActiveScanImpl.java:63)
>  at org.apache.accumulo.core.client.impl.InstanceOperationsImpl.getActiveScans(InstanceOperationsImpl.java:138)
>  at org.apache.accumulo.test.functional.ScanIdIT.testScanId(ScanIdIT.java:151)
> {noformat}
> The table from the previous test was deleted at the end of the test, but, somehow, a
tabletserver returned an ActiveScan for that table. When the client tried to unwrap the table
ID into a table name, it got a TableNotFoundException.
> Semantically, if a client is asking for active scans on a server, and the server reports
a scan for a table the client doesn't think exists, it's reasonable to assume it was just
deleted and not return that ActiveScan from the API call.
> Right now, this situation results in an exception back to the client and they get no
results.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message