Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E746518604 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 18:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68946 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2015 18:21:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 68908 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2015 18:21:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 68747 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2015 18:21:00 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 May 2015 18:21:00 +0000 Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 18:21:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "John Vines (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-3805) No means to monitor/interact with FATE programmatically MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 John Vines created ACCUMULO-3805: ------------------------------------ Summary: No means to monitor/interact with FATE programmatically Key: ACCUMULO-3805 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3805 Project: Accumulo Issue Type: Bug Components: fate Reporter: John Vines With FATE, we have the ability to have strong tracking of operations. However, we hide a lot of this from the client. We have admin utilities plumbed into the shell (FateCommand), but they're not actual APIs. This means there is no API available for failing/deleting/listing fate operations, but it also means there no way to be aware of the txid for a fate operation. This is critical for instances where a potentially distributed client wants to perform a FATEd operation. In an ideal world, client would be able to pre-seed the transaction, as we do now, and then issue the command with that id. This would allow the client to be aware of the transaction before it's started so it could be shared. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)