accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Josh Elser (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-3856) ProxyServer.update fails silently if batchwriter doesn't exist
Date Thu, 28 May 2015 18:36:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14563431#comment-14563431
] 

Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-3856:
--------------------------------------

Bah, I'm a knucklehead. Yeah I can do that.

> ProxyServer.update fails silently if batchwriter doesn't exist
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-3856
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3856
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: proxy
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.6.3, 1.8.0, 1.7.1
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Inspecting ProxyServer, saw the following:
> {code}
>   @Override
>   public void update(String writer, Map<ByteBuffer,List<ColumnUpdate>> cells)
throws TException {
>     try {
>       BatchWriterPlusException bwpe = getWriter(writer);
>       addCellsToWriter(cells, bwpe);
>     } catch (UnknownWriter e) {
>       // just drop it, this is a oneway thrift call and throwing a TException seems to
make all subsequent thrift calls fail
>     }
>   }
> {code}
> This means that calls to update which fail to get a BatchWriter (for whatever reason)
will silently fail and appear to the user to have written data successfully. This is horrible.
> I'm not sure what the comment means either. I'm not sure why throwing a TException from
the server would invalidate the connection, but perhaps I'm just ignorant of some finer details.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message