Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F055C17A94 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 18:28:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83501 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2015 18:28:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 83459 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2015 18:28:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 83444 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2015 18:28:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 18:28:13 +0000 Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 18:28:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Christopher Tubbs (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-3548) Classes leaked through InstanceOperations into public API methods MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher Tubbs updated ACCUMULO-3548: ---------------------------------------- Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug) Parent: ACCUMULO-3657 > Classes leaked through InstanceOperations into public API methods > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-3548 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3548 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: client > Reporter: Josh Elser > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 1.8.0 > > > Looking through ACCUMULO-3204, I noticed that we're (inadvertently?) using a few classes in the public API without having them defined in the public API. > {{connector.instanceOperations().getActiveScans()}} is what uses ActiveScan in the public API. This provides a way for users to be relying on something that should be stable that doesn't hold us to providing stability. ActiveScan also leaks Column and KeyExtent. > * {{activeScan.getColumns()}} > * {{activeScan.getExtent()}} > It looks like {{ActiveCompaction}} does similar things. > We should make sure these classes are in the public API (force us to ensure they stay stable). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)