Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 437B817B3A for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67255 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2015 16:44:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 67221 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2015 16:44:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 67198 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2015 16:44:39 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:44:39 +0000 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:44:39 +0000 (UTC) From: "Christopher Tubbs (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-3650) Remove ProtocolBuffers dependency from core MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14357156#comment-14357156 ] Christopher Tubbs commented on ACCUMULO-3650: --------------------------------------------- While I don't mind protobuf being used, it does seem that we use it for so little that it doesn't seem to me to be "worth the pain", either. I'd favor removing it (at least for now, and until we have a compelling need to leverage it later). > Remove ProtocolBuffers dependency from core > ------------------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-3650 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3650 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Task > Components: client, replication > Reporter: Josh Elser > Assignee: Josh Elser > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 1.7.0 > > > Protocol buffers was used as a part of the data-center replication feature. It was meant to be a server-side only construct, not leaking out to clients, but this unintentionally happened via ReplicationOperationsImpl. > If we move this functionality into the master or tserver, we could avoid the need for clients to even know this is happening under the hood. It would give users more flexibility without running into issues like HADOOP-9845. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)