accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christopher Tubbs (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-3602) BatchScanner optimization for AccumuloInputFormat
Date Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:32:12 GMT


Christopher Tubbs commented on ACCUMULO-3602:

By default, the {{AccumuloInputFormat}} does not produce a split for each range specified.
Rather, it merges overlapping ranges and splits them on tablet boundaries, and then assigns
the results 1 per mapper. (see {{InputFormatBase.setAutoAdjustRanges(...)}})

However, this optimization will not be useful if the ranges are not adjacent / do not overlap.
A {{MultiRangeInputSplit}} may be possible. For the particular use case described (z-ordered
multi-dimensional indexes), I think there's often a trade-off in querying multiple ranges
vs. fine-grained filtering over a larger range. For example, sometimes it's better to query
a larger range and let an iterator filter out non-matching results, and sometimes it's better
to query multiple ranges. This is a hard-to-generalize optimization problem, but the fact
that you're producing many ranges, sufficient to start causing problems informs me that there
may be room for improvement here (at least for that use case).

Regarding the other issue mentioned here for the TabletLocator functionality, that is encapsulated
in another issue: ACCUMULO-2883

> BatchScanner optimization for AccumuloInputFormat
> -------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-3602
>                 URL:
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: client
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.1, 1.6.2
>            Reporter: Eugene Cheipesh
>            Assignee: Eugene Cheipesh
>              Labels: performance
> Currently {{AccumuloInputFormat}} produces a split for reach {{Range}} specified in the
configuration. Some table indexing schemes, for instance z-order geospacial index, produce
large number of small ranges resulting in large number of splits. This is specifically a concern
when using {{AccumuloInputFormat}} as a source for Spark RDD where each Split is mapped to
an RDD partition.
> Large number of small RDD partitions leads to poor parallism on read and high overhead
on processing. A desirable alternative is to group ranges by tablet into a single split and
use {{BatchScanner}} to produce the records. Grouping by tablets is useful because it represents
Accumulos attempt to distributed stored records and can be influance by the user through table
> The grouping functionality already exists in the internal {{TabletLocator}} class. 
> Current proposal is to modify {{AbstractInputFormat}} such that it generates either {{RangeInputSplit}}
or {{MultiRangeInputSplit}} based on a new setting in {{InputConfigurator}}.  {{AccumuloInputFormat}}
would then be able to inspect the type of the split and instantiate an appropriate reader.
> The functinality of {{TabletLocator}} should be exposed as a public API in 1.7 as it
is useful for optimizations.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message