accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Keith Turner (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-3548) Classes leaked through InstanceOperations into public API methods
Date Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:06:35 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14299059#comment-14299059
] 

Keith Turner commented on ACCUMULO-3548:
----------------------------------------

{{KeyExtent}} is also referenced through the public methods of {{MutationsRejectedException}}

> Classes leaked through InstanceOperations into public API methods
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-3548
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3548
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: client
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> Looking through ACCUMULO-3204, I noticed that we're (inadvertently?) using a few classes
in the public API without having them defined in the public API.
> {{connector.instanceOperations().getActiveScans()}} is what uses ActiveScan in the public
API. This provides a way for users to be relying on something that should be stable that doesn't
hold us to providing stability. ActiveScan also leaks Column and KeyExtent.
> * {{activeScan.getColumns()}}
> * {{activeScan.getExtent()}}
> It looks like {{ActiveCompaction}} does similar things.
> We should make sure these classes are in the public API (force us to ensure they stay
stable).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message