Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04E4B10C4E for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 01:51:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56347 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2014 01:51:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 56298 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2014 01:51:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 56281 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2014 01:51:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 01:51:13 +0000 Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 01:51:13 +0000 (UTC) From: "Corey J. Nolet (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-2944) Generated configuration files and scripts assume SUN as JVM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14254443#comment-14254443 ] Corey J. Nolet commented on ACCUMULO-2944: ------------------------------------------ It looks like a pull request was merged in for this ticket. Can this be closed? > Generated configuration files and scripts assume SUN as JVM > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-2944 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2944 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: build > Affects Versions: 1.6.0 > Environment: IBM JVM > Reporter: Hayden Marchant > Assignee: Hayden Marchant > Fix For: 1.7.0, 1.6.3 > > Original Estimate: 72h > Remaining Estimate: 72h > > There are a few issues, detailed below: > a. The generated configuration files contain references to GC > params that are specific to Sun JVM. In accumulo-env.sh, the > ACCUMULO_TSERVER_OPTS contains -XX:NewSize and -XX:MaxNewSize , and also in ACCUMULO_GENERAL_OPTS, > -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction=75 are used. > b. in bin/accumulo, get ClassNotFoundException due to > specification of JAXP Doc Builder: > -Djavax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory=com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.DocumentBuilderFactoryImpl > . > The Sun implementation of Document Builder Factory does not exists > in IBM JDK, so a ClassNotFoundException is thrown on running accumulo > script > c. MiniAccumuloCluster - in the MiniAccumuloClusterImpl, > Sun-speciifc GC params are passed as params to the java process (similar > to section a. ) > Single proposal for solving all 3 issues: > Enhance bootstrap_config.sh with request to select Java vendor. > Selecting this will set correct values for GC params (they differ between > IBM and Sun), inclusion/ommision of JAXP setting. The > MiniAccumuloClusterImpl can read the same env variable that was set in > code for the GC Params, and use in the exec command. > For exampel, doing this will result in CMS settings existing for SUN JVM, but when using IBM JVM, the relevant GC parameter for IBM JVM will be used instead. In addition, the SUN JAXP implementation will be omitted on non-SUN JVM. > For now, I plan on having 4 options in new question > 1. Sun > 2. OpenJDK > 3. IBM > 4. Other -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)