Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D270E17C9B for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 17:50:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5146 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2014 17:50:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 5114 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2014 17:50:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 5097 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2014 17:50:34 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 17:50:34 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 17:50:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Josh Elser (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Comment Edited] (ACCUMULO-3303) funky performance with large WAL MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14200530#comment-14200530 ] Josh Elser edited comment on ACCUMULO-3303 at 11/6/14 5:49 PM: --------------------------------------------------------------- bq. Logically, it makes sense, but it might not be obvious to people that haven't thought about all of the implications of WAL sizing. We (at least) have the descriptions on in the [user manual|http://accumulo.apache.org/1.6/accumulo_user_manual.html] on tserver.memory.maps.max and tserver.walog.max.size. I'll open an issue to add a section to the user manual that can specifically cover this subject (since the two sentences don't quite give it enough justice). ACCUMULO-3308 was (Author: elserj): bq. Logically, it makes sense, but it might not be obvious to people that haven't thought about all of the implications of WAL sizing. We (at least) have the descriptions on in the [user manual|http://accumulo.apache.org/1.6/accumulo_user_manual.html] on tserver.memory.maps.max and tserver.walog.max.size. I'll open an issue to add a section to the user manual that can specifically cover this subject (since the two sentences don't quite give it enough justice). > funky performance with large WAL > -------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-3303 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3303 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Bug > Components: logger, tserver > Affects Versions: 1.6.1 > Reporter: Adam Fuchs > Attachments: 1GB_WAL.png, 2GB_WAL.png, 4GB_WAL.png, 512MB_WAL.png, 8GB_WAL.png, WAL_disabled.png > > > The tserver seems to get into a funky state when writing to a large write-ahead log. I ran some continuous ingest tests varying tserver.walog.max.size in {512M, 1G, 2G, 4G, 8G} and got some results that I have yet to understand. I was expecting to see the effects of walog metadata management as described in ACCUMULO-2889, but I also found an additional behavior of ingest slowing down for long periods when using a large walog size. > The cluster configuration was as follows: > {code} > Accumulo version: 1.6.2-SNAPSHOT (current head of origin/1.6) > Nodes: 4 > Masters: 1 > Slaves: 3 > Cores per node: 24 > Drives per node: 8x1TB data + 2 raided system > Memory per node: 64GB > tserver.memory.maps.max=2G > table.file.compress.type=snappy (for ci table only) > tserver.mutation.queue.max=16M > tserver.wal.sync.method=hflush > Native maps enabled > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)