accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Josh Elser (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-3139) BalanceAfterCommsFailureIT alters other tservers on the system
Date Wed, 17 Sep 2014 19:06:33 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14137760#comment-14137760
] 

Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-3139:
--------------------------------------

The downside here is that we have to reflect to get at the pid inside of UNIXProcess, but
I don't think that's the end of the world. We could exec out to some bash to try to guess,
but that would be error prone too.

> BalanceAfterCommsFailureIT alters other tservers on the system
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-3139
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-3139
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: test
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>            Assignee: Josh Elser
>             Fix For: 1.6.1, 1.7.0
>
>
> BalanceAfterCommsFailureIT does a SIGSTOP and then SIGCONT to simulate some network outage.
It uses pkill to send the signals which will send that to any processes on the system matching
"TabletServer".
> This isn't really ideal (and I believe is actually error prone if there is a TabletServer
running on the same node by a different user). Figuring out a way to target only the TabletServers
running in the minicluster for this test is much better.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message