Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CA6711985 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 17:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10916 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2014 17:54:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10877 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2014 17:54:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10852 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2014 17:54:24 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 17:54:24 +0000 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 17:54:24 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sean Busbey (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-2967) Unknown Host results in unending wait for clients MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated ACCUMULO-2967: ---------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Unknown Host results in unending wait for clients > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-2967 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2967 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Bug > Components: fate > Affects Versions: 1.5.1, 1.6.0 > Reporter: Sean Busbey > Assignee: Sean Busbey > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 1.5.2, 1.6.1, 1.7.0 > > Time Spent: 0.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Per ACCUMULO-2224, we're supposed to retry DNS failures until we hit a particular timeout. > Testing shows that when passed a bogus DNS name, instead we just keep waiting indefinitely. > Looking at the code, I think the "has it been too long" check is in the wrong place. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)