Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 089AF114A9 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10667 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2014 20:06:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10631 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2014 20:06:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 10555 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2014 20:06:24 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:06:24 +0000 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 20:06:24 +0000 (UTC) From: "Mike Drob (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-2923) Replication configuration expected numeric only table IDs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14036283#comment-14036283 ] Mike Drob commented on ACCUMULO-2923: ------------------------------------- They're really base 36, but I don't think that matters for your implementation. > Replication configuration expected numeric only table IDs > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-2923 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2923 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Bug > Components: replication > Reporter: Josh Elser > Assignee: Josh Elser > Fix For: 1.7.0 > > > Past Josh forgot that table IDs are not strictly numeric. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)