Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jira@apache.org
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Eric Newton (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12718880.1402073542996.82847.1402075563876@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12718880.1402073542996@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12718880.1402073542996@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-2866) Default WAL size should be based
 on HDFS Block Size
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14020088#comment-14020088 ] 

Eric Newton commented on ACCUMULO-2866:
---------------------------------------

I'm just trying to understand what would be better than what we do now.

Presently accumulo sets the WAL block size to be slightly larger than the max size of the WAL (defaulting to 1G).


> Default WAL size should be based on HDFS Block Size
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-2866
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2866
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: tserver
>            Reporter: Mike Drob
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: wal
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> HBase automatically defaults their WAL size to 0.95 * HDFS block size. This makes a lot of sense from a resource management perspective, and we should do the same.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)