Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 158BF11088 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19326 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2014 14:14:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 18863 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2014 14:14:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 18854 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2014 14:14:02 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:14:02 +0000 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 14:14:02 +0000 (UTC) From: "Keith Turner (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-2787) Accumulo too strict about max files MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14026473#comment-14026473 ] Keith Turner commented on ACCUMULO-2787: ---------------------------------------- Does setting nofile to 65k cause problems that 32k does not? > Accumulo too strict about max files > ----------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-2787 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2787 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Bug > Components: start > Affects Versions: 1.5.1, 1.6.0 > Reporter: Mike Drob > Labels: newbie > > Accumulo is very aggressive about asking for 65536 max open files, when really something like 10k is probably fine. > We should lower the WARN threshold. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)