accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hayden Marchant (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-2943) Usage of SecureRandom with "SUN" as RNG provider causes lots of failures
Date Tue, 24 Jun 2014 07:04:25 GMT
Hayden Marchant created ACCUMULO-2943:
-----------------------------------------

             Summary: Usage of SecureRandom with "SUN" as RNG provider causes lots of failures
                 Key: ACCUMULO-2943
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2943
             Project: Accumulo
          Issue Type: Sub-task
    Affects Versions: 1.6.0
         Environment: IBM JVM
            Reporter: Hayden Marchant
             Fix For: 1.6.1, 1.7.0


Both org.apache.accumulo.core.security.crypto.CrypoTest & org.apache.accumulo.core.file.rfile.RFileTest
have lots of failures due to calls to SEcureRandom with Random Number Generator Provider hard-coded
as Sun. The IBM JVM has it's own built in RNG Provider called IBMJCE. 2 issues - hard-coded
calls to SecureRandom.getInstance(<algo>,"SUN") and also default value in Property class
is "SUN". 

Options for proposals:

1. Add mechanism to override default Property through System property through new annotator
in Property class. Only usage will be by Property.CRYPTO_SECURE_RNG_PROVIDER

The default is SUN, as coded in the Property class. 

Some of the unit tests explicitly call SecureRandom.getInstance() with SUN as provider. Others
rely on the default value, which is SUN (and do not rely on accumulo-site.xml in which this
can be overridden). For the system tests, I propose adding an override through a System property.
For regular execution of accumulo, accumulo-site.xml can include the adjusted default. However,
system tests will also fall on same problem.

Another solution would be to have a factory class which supplies JVM specific behaviour, such
as default NRG provider - this could be used by the Property class to retrieve this value
based on the System.property for java.vendor etc.....



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message