Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F69311664 for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 04:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46838 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2014 22:13:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 46790 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2014 22:13:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 46781 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2014 22:13:04 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 May 2014 22:13:04 +0000 Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 22:13:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Keith Turner (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-1067) InstanceOperations.setProperty / getSystemConfiguration inconsistent state MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Keith Turner updated ACCUMULO-1067: ----------------------------------- Assignee: (was: Keith Turner) > InstanceOperations.setProperty / getSystemConfiguration inconsistent state > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-1067 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1067 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Bug > Components: client > Environment: Found when testing 1.5/trunk MiniAccumuloCluster, but could exist in real clusters. > Reporter: Jim Klucar > Priority: Minor > > Performing an InstanceOperations.setProperty followed by an InstanceOperations.getSystemConfiguration can show that the property set wasn't actually set. This is most likely due to the fact that getSystemConfiguration contacts a random tserver to get the configuration, and that request could be received before the pub/sub event from Zookeeper is received. Potential solution is to have this method contact the Master directly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)