Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2CAE10251 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6577 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2014 15:47:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 5475 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2014 15:47:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 5413 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2014 15:47:24 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:47:24 +0000 Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:47:24 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bill Havanki (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-2423) Converge Shell scripts on single implementation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13918175#comment-13918175 ] Bill Havanki commented on ACCUMULO-2423: ---------------------------------------- I much prefer bash over sh. bash 3 is certainly an acceptable minimum. Like Christopher said, bash 4 isn't shipped with Mac OS X ... [even Mavericks is still on 3.2|http://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/100915/what-version-of-bash-comes-with-osx-10-9-mavericks]. However, it's easy to get it via [Homebrew|http://brew.sh] or [MacPorts|http://macports.org] so it's not that unreasonable to require it there. > Converge Shell scripts on single implementation > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-2423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2423 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 1.6.0 > Reporter: Mike Drob > > Do we want to have a stated dependency on a particular shell? Most of our scripts explicitly use bash, but some use sh. Most scripts invoke {{#\!/usr/bin/env bash}} but some do {{#\!/bin/bash}} or other crazy things. > I don't have a particular preference which way we go, but I'd like to see us standardize one way or the other. > If we use {{/bin/sh}}, then we can run everything through the [checkbashisms|https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh#I_am_a_developer._How_can_I_avoid_this_problem_in_future.3F] script (also available for other distros) > If we go the other way, and switch everything to bash, then we can run them through {{ksh -n}} for deprecation warnings. I know that's a different shell, but they're still moderately useful. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)