Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jira@apache.org
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:34:21 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Keith Turner (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12685312.1387340599596.101671.1393349661471@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12685312.1387340599596@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12685312.1387340599596@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-2052) Recommend using viewfs:// or HA
 Namenode
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13911761#comment-13911761 ] 

Keith Turner commented on ACCUMULO-2052:
----------------------------------------

oh yeah, I meant to ref this ticket in the commit msg but forgot to

> Recommend using viewfs:// or HA Namenode
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-2052
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2052
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: docs
>            Reporter: Keith Turner
>              Labels: Documentation
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> Given that recovering from a failed namenode in 1.6 could be tricky (see ACCUMULO-1832).  I think we should recommend using viewfs:// or HA namenodes in documentation.    Using either of these approaches, there would be no need to rewrite uris in Accumulo.   Only hadoop config would need to be changed if the namenode is moved.   


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)