Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B83410605 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 18:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66543 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2014 18:15:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 66391 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2014 18:15:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 66368 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2014 18:15:20 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 18:15:20 +0000 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 18:15:20 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bill Havanki (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-2228) Security randomwalk fails when namenode dies before bulk import MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13878936#comment-13878936 ] Bill Havanki commented on ACCUMULO-2228: ---------------------------------------- I'll update the randomwalk README to warn that errors like this are likely without HADOOP-9792 in place. The testing I'm doing must be done on 2.0.0, but we recommend using 2.2.0, so trying to fix it here isn't worthwhile. See ACCUMULO-2227 for more discussion. > Security randomwalk fails when namenode dies before bulk import > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-2228 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2228 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Bug > Components: test > Affects Versions: 1.4.4 > Reporter: Bill Havanki > Assignee: Bill Havanki > Labels: ha, randomwalk, test > > Running Security randomwalk under HDFS HA, if the active namenode is killed: > {noformat} > 20 13:55:58,287 [retry.RetryInvocationHandler] WARN : Exception while invoking class org.apache.hado > op.hdfs.protocolPB.ClientNamenodeProtocolTranslatorPB.create. Not retrying because the invoked metho > d is not idempotent, and unable to determine whether it was invoked > java.io.IOException: Failed on local exception: java.io.IOException: Response is null.; Host Details > : local host is: "slave.domain.com/10.20.200.113"; destination host is: "namenode.domain.com":8020; > ... > at org.apache.accumulo.core.file.rfile.RFileOperations.openWriter(RFileOperations.java:124) > at org.apache.accumulo.core.file.DispatchingFileFactory.openWriter(FileOperations.java:80) > at org.apache.accumulo.server.test.randomwalk.security.TableOp.visit(TableOp.java:177) > at org.apache.accumulo.server.test.randomwalk.Module.visit(Module.java:251) > ... > Caused by: java.io.IOException: Response is null. > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.receiveResponse(Client.java:952) > at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client$Connection.run(Client.java:847) > {noformat} > This arises from an attempt to write an rfile.The test should be resilient here (and for other file system operations) so that the test can continue once failover has completed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)