Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFCF510403 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 20:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20365 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2014 20:58:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 20322 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jan 2014 20:58:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 20313 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jan 2014 20:58:50 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 20:58:50 +0000 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 20:58:50 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jared Winick (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-2113) Verify that The Hammer approach to resource leak is a viable short term fix MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13860751#comment-13860751 ] Jared Winick commented on ACCUMULO-2113: ---------------------------------------- [~kturner] are you referring to a version that would require changes to the ThriftConnectionPool and ZooSession to make them able to shutdown their resources without these reflection and thread hacks? I wasn't planning on that in the near term, especially if there is a working, albeit ugly, way of cleaning up resources against an unpatched Accumulo 1.5.0. Would this non-reflection version be what actually gets added to 1.4.5, 1.5.1, 1.6.0? FWIW, I tested the example web application on Tomcat 6.0.37 with the same successful results. > Verify that The Hammer approach to resource leak is a viable short term fix > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-2113 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2113 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Task > Affects Versions: 1.4.5, 1.5.1, 1.6.0 > Reporter: Sean Busbey > Assignee: Jared Winick > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 1.4.5, 1.5.1, 1.6.0 > > Attachments: ACCUMULO-2113-ResourceGraph-Tomcat.png, ACCUMULO-2113-ResourceGraph.png > > > ACCUMULO-1858 contains a link to a test harness for verifying that we aren't leaking resources in e.g. Tomcat. > We need someone to take "The Hammer" approach [proposed by Keith|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/accumulo-dev/201312.mbox/%3CCAGUtCHrThjFW-u%2BJK%2BZYALB-qut2VNd5AH1Sb8o7UcQFUXM4xA%40mail.gmail.com%3E] and verify that it successfully stops the leak. > Afterwords, results should be linked to on the mailing list so we can come to consensus on how to handle the API change for releases. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)