Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jira@apache.org
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:07:52 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Josh Elser (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12642770.1366133021040.71422.1389301672335@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12642770.1366133021040@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12642770.1366133021040@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-1280) Add close method to iterators
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13867058#comment-13867058 ] 

Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-1280:
--------------------------------------

>From an API standpoint, perhaps a new hypothetical API which is backwards compatible SKVI would be sufficient? That doesn't seem like it would be too difficult to accomplish with a small shim.

> Add close method to iterators
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-1280
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1280
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Keith Turner
>
> It would be useful if Accumulo iterators had a close method.  Accumulo would call this when its finished using the iterator stack.
> How would this work w/ isolation?
> Is it ok to break the iterator API?


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)