accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christopher Tubbs (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-2059) Namespace constraints easily get clobbered by table constraints
Date Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:40:38 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13881448#comment-13881448
] 

Christopher Tubbs commented on ACCUMULO-2059:
---------------------------------------------

I don't recall that conversation, but no, it didn't happen. Constraints still apply to namespaces.
This is still a current issue. I'm not sure if the behavior is tolerable or if we need to
fix it, though.

> Namespace constraints easily get clobbered by table constraints
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-2059
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2059
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: client
>            Reporter: John Vines
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> This is why ShellServerIT#namespaces is failing currently. When you create a table with
the default configurations, that includes a DefaultKeySizeConstraint at constraint.1. This
overlaps the namespaces defined constraint.1, which is a NumericValueConstraint for the test.
> The issue is I'm not sure if this is accepted behavior or not. Constraint settings are
already sorta wonky, but this is not the time to rewrite it. Before I fix it, I just need
to know if that is tolerable behavior or if we want namespace constraints to start at a different
value, like constraint.101 to minimize impact. Thoughts are requested.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Mime
View raw message