accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christopher Tubbs (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-2100) instamo-archetype could use a little clean up
Date Mon, 30 Dec 2013 22:17:50 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13859128#comment-13859128
] 

Christopher Tubbs commented on ACCUMULO-2100:
---------------------------------------------

Why was the artifact re-versioned to 2.0.0? This could be very confusing if it doesn't match
Accumulo's versioning (especially, the major version).

> instamo-archetype could use a little clean up
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-2100
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2100
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: instamo-archetype
>            Reporter: Michael Wall
>            Assignee: Josh Elser
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Some of the things I noticed
> - mvn test fails, because it took longer than 30 secs to startup the MAC on my linux
box.
> - README needs to be updated, usage is incorrect
> - pom.xml doesn't hook exec:exec into any lifecycle so you have to call mvn compile exec:exec
-Pwhatever
> - Could abstract out a MiniAccumuloClusterWrapper to handle the temp directory clean
up and make the usage across the ShellExample, MapReduceExample and ExampleAccumuloUnitTest
consistent.  Would also make it easier to implement ACCUMULO-2097 and ACCUMULO-2098
> BTW, I am running this against the origin/1.5 branch, targeting an archetype that is
compatible with Accumulo 1.5.0
> Patch coming for review



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Mime
View raw message