accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-1866) get rid of Instance.getConfiguration()
Date Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:15:36 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13829358#comment-13829358
] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on ACCUMULO-1866:
-----------------------------------------------------------

Commit de8ecd4a71cb7fda3525798c7e658c8f65efe6c2 in branch refs/heads/1.6.0-SNAPSHOT from [~ctubbsii]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=accumulo.git;h=de8ecd4 ]

ACCUMULO-1866 Add missing deprecation annotations


> get rid of Instance.getConfiguration()
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-1866
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1866
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael Berman
>            Assignee: Keith Turner
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> It emerged when I introduced ClientConfiguration that there is general consensus that
Instance.getConfiguration() should never have existed...Instance is supposed to be about the
client, AccumuloConfiguration is supposed to be about the server.  We should pull it out.
 We should also decide if this was really part of the public client API, in which case we
probably want to think about a suitable replacement (maybe implemented in terms of ClientConfiguration).
> [~kturner] said he was looking into whether or not he wants to do it for 1.6.0.  If not,
I'm interested in looking into it for a future release, as part of a bigger effort to push
ClientConfiguration deeper throughout the stack.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Mime
View raw message