Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jira@apache.org
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 16:42:44 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Billie Rinaldi (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12668488.1379083053107.39571.1381336964136@arcas>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12668488.1379083053107@arcas>
References: <JIRA.12668488.1379083053107@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-1714) Do we need to take care of
 crypto based export control policy?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13790597#comment-13790597 ] 

Billie Rinaldi commented on ACCUMULO-1714:
------------------------------------------

Thanks for starting that discussion.  What I gather from your thread as well as [1] is that we are still using the process outlined on dev/crypto.html.  Also, I note that no one replied to your question as to whether ACCUMULO-998 needs to follow the policy as well, but someone states on the earlier thread "Note the threshold is -using- that encryption mechanism, not that your code -implements- that cryptographic code."

[1]: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201306.mbox/%3C87ehc6b355.fsf@v35516.1blu.de%3E

> Do we need to take care of crypto based export control policy?
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-1714
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1714
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: John Vines
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> This came up in ACCUMULO-1009, but also may affect ACCUMULO-998.
> Related info:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-118
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/
> http://markmail.org/message/jduwmahz7nfcrzw6
> http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
> The dev/crypto.html is from the last version in 2010, which has changed based on some legal-discuss items I read.
> Initial thoughts are:
> ACCUMULO-998 is fine because we do not ship ANY crypto modules with that, just an interface to use them
> ACCUMULO-1009 is not fine IF we bundle bouncycastle in with us.


--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)