accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John Vines (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-1834) ReviewBoard guidelines
Date Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:55:19 GMT


John Vines commented on ACCUMULO-1834:

I think similar rules to our consensus voting is sufficient - 2 binding (committer) "ship
it's" are sufficient. I don't think a defined time period is necessary because it can easily
be reverted, so if there is an issue with it, it can be brought up before it's committed,
or afterward if there's a delay.

> ReviewBoard guidelines
> ----------------------
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-1834
>                 URL:
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: docs
>            Reporter: Josh Elser
>              Labels: Documentation
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
> We currently don't have any guidelines on how we should be using reviewboard.
> For example -- How many "ship it"'s are needed to merit consensus? How do we make sure
that reviews get applied after consensus is reached?
> Figure out what to do and then write it down.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message