Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BE9D10858 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31126 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2013 20:09:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 30885 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2013 20:09:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 30530 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2013 20:09:52 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 20:09:52 +0000 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:09:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Billie Rinaldi (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-1604) ColumnAgeOffFilter doesn't validate options correctly MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13759385#comment-13759385 ] Billie Rinaldi commented on ACCUMULO-1604: ------------------------------------------ It's going to be ugly, though. I might be inclined towards something descriptive in this case, since unfixed names is not a common configuration pattern. > ColumnAgeOffFilter doesn't validate options correctly > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ACCUMULO-1604 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1604 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Christopher Tubbs > Labels: newbie > Fix For: 1.6.0 > > > The o.a.a.core.iterators.user.ColumnAgeOffFilter doesn't validate options correctly. It incorrectly assumes all options are for itself, and ignores the fact that some options may be for the parent class ("negate" option on Filter). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira