accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William Slacum (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-1737) MultiTableBatchScanner
Date Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:47:03 GMT


William Slacum commented on ACCUMULO-1737:

Bit of a tangent, but what ordering guarantees does a BatchScanner have?
> MultiTableBatchScanner
> ----------------------
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-1737
>                 URL:
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: client
>            Reporter: John Vines
> We currently have the BatchScanner, which does not guarantee in order results with the
benefit of higher parallellization. Unfortunately, if you want to query multiple tables, the
only option is to chain BatchScanner's together, but you lose something of the optimizations
under the hood for both using system resources well as well as getting data back in order.
We have another ticket for multi-table accumulo input format for mapreduce, but I would like
to see a multi table version of a batch scanner for regular client use.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message