accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Billie Rinaldi (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-1604) ColumnAgeOffFilter doesn't validate options correctly
Date Thu, 05 Sep 2013 19:39:51 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13759355#comment-13759355
] 

Billie Rinaldi commented on ACCUMULO-1604:
------------------------------------------

Good point.  I guess this is an issue whenever the option names aren't fixed.  If the iterator
doesn't use fixed option names, and has a superclass or the possibility of a subclass that
has any options, it needs to use a prefix so that it doesn't pick up options that aren't its
own.  I believe the ColumnAgeOffFilter is the only iterator that currently has this issue.
                
> ColumnAgeOffFilter doesn't validate options correctly
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-1604
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1604
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Christopher Tubbs
>              Labels: newbie
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> The o.a.a.core.iterators.user.ColumnAgeOffFilter doesn't validate options correctly.
It incorrectly assumes all options are for itself, and ignores the fact that some options
may be for the parent class ("negate" option on Filter).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message