Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6980610DBD for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37982 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2013 21:29:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 37947 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2013 21:29:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 37938 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2013 21:29:23 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 21:29:23 +0000 Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 21:29:23 +0000 (UTC) From: "John Vines (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-1547) PermisionHandler should do set operations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 John Vines created ACCUMULO-1547: ------------------------------------ Summary: PermisionHandler should do set operations Key: ACCUMULO-1547 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1547 Project: Accumulo Issue Type: Improvement Components: tserver Reporter: John Vines In the permission handler interface, we have calls to grant/revoke a single permission. It would be more beneficial on the backend to allow bundled operations. It may also be better for client use, but that would require exposing it through the API. In the same scope, this may be something we want to consider for the get() calls to optimize cases where multiple permissions get checked in a single call. I would like to do this for 1.6 I think, since the interface is still a bit limber, but this is something we can easily make backwards compatible, I think. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira