Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BDD4F67D for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 01:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62142 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2013 01:28:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-accumulo-notifications-archive@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 62093 invoked by uid 500); 4 Apr 2013 01:28:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: jira@apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@accumulo.apache.org Received: (qmail 62084 invoked by uid 99); 4 Apr 2013 01:28:14 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 01:28:14 +0000 Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 01:28:14 +0000 (UTC) From: "Keith Turner (JIRA)" To: notifications@accumulo.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-1228) Allow clients to disable column families and locality groups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13621628#comment-13621628 ] Keith Turner commented on ACCUMULO-1228: ---------------------------------------- I agree w/ [~ctubbsii] and think a using locality groups for queries is a bad a idea. Consider the following events. # locality group LG1=CF1,CF2,CF3 is defined # user writes code that scans LG1 # its determined that LG1=CF1,CF2 and LG2=CF3 is a more optimal configuration for some important use cases, so this config change is made # code that scans LG1 breaks In the contrived example above, if the code had scanned over CF1,CF2,CF3 instead of LG1, then it would have continued to work after the locality group configuration change. > Allow clients to disable column families and locality groups > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ACCUMULO-1228 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1228 > Project: Accumulo > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: client, tserver > Affects Versions: 1.5.0 > Reporter: William Slacum > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.6.0 > > > There's an inconsistency between what a server is capable of and what a client can tell it to do with respect to fetching column families. > Currently, a user can tell a {{Scanner}} to fetch some set of column families. The iterators support not only this, but also the converse where a user does not want to retrieve column families. An iterator implementation can do this by hand, but a client cannot specifically tell a Scanner to not return data from a set of column families. Clients should be able to specify this option. > There also seems to be an inconsistency with how locality groups are defined and then utilized. If I want to specify a set of column families as being part of a locality group, I have to provide a mapping of locality group name to a list of column families. If I want to fetch a locality group, I have to get the mapping first, rather than just set which locality group I want to use. It'd be more convenient to tell the scanner just to fetch which locality groups I want, and have the server know which column families that means. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira