accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eric Newton (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-1082) InMemoryMapTest fails on some platforms
Date Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:48:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13583577#comment-13583577
] 

Eric Newton commented on ACCUMULO-1082:
---------------------------------------

You aren't the only one... Billie reported the same thing.  We probably need to loosen the
timing constraints.
                
> InMemoryMapTest fails on some platforms
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-1082
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1082
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tserver
>            Reporter: Adam Fuchs
>            Assignee: Keith Turner
>
> I get a sporadic test failure with InMemoryMapTest with a quad core macbook pro, running
TRUNK as of just after the 1.5 branching. Not sure if this is more of a test of Accumulo or
of the platform.
> {code}
> Running org.apache.accumulo.server.tabletserver.InMemoryMapTest
> 13/02/21 15:05:23 INFO tabletserver.InMemoryMapTest: 514000.0 mutations per second with
1 threads
> 13/02/21 15:05:24 INFO tabletserver.InMemoryMapTest: 379000.0 mutations per second with
2 threads
> 13/02/21 15:05:25 INFO tabletserver.InMemoryMapTest: 396299.9 mutations per second with
16 threads
> 13/02/21 15:05:26 INFO tabletserver.InMemoryMapTest: 292196.0 mutations per second with
64 threads
> 13/02/21 15:05:27 INFO tabletserver.InMemoryMapTest: 208366.9 mutations per second with
256 threads
> 13/02/21 15:05:27 WARN conf.SiteConfiguration: accumulo-site.xml not found on classpath
> 13/02/21 15:05:27 INFO compress.CodecPool: Got brand-new decompressor
> 13/02/21 15:05:27 INFO compress.CodecPool: Got brand-new decompressor
> Tests run: 9, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5.433 sec <<<
FAILURE!
> {code}
> {code}
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Test set: org.apache.accumulo.server.tabletserver.InMemoryMapTest
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tests run: 9, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5.433 sec <<<
FAILURE!
> testParallelWriteSpeed(org.apache.accumulo.server.tabletserver.InMemoryMapTest)  Time
elapsed: 5.38 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
>   at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:55)
>   at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:22)
>   at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:31)
>   at junit.framework.TestCase.assertTrue(TestCase.java:201)
>   at org.apache.accumulo.server.tabletserver.InMemoryMapTest.testParallelWriteSpeed(InMemoryMapTest.java:344)
>   at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>   at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>   at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>   at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>   at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:176)
>   at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:141)
>   at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:122)
>   at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:142)
>   at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:125)
>   at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:129)
>   at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:255)
>   at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:250)
>   at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:84)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:236)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:134)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:113)
>   at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>   at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>   at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>   at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>   at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
> {code}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message