accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christopher Tubbs (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-996) explore exposing accumulo token in proxy
Date Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:47:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13567632#comment-13567632
] 

Christopher Tubbs commented on ACCUMULO-996:
--------------------------------------------

If you make AuthType a string (classname?), instead of an enum, the API doesn't have to be
extended as new authentication types are made available. I'm not sure the challenge option
is necessary. I think that the proxy is the real client, and should do the authentication
challenge/response if it is required for that authentication type, and the client of the proxy
should just give the proxy the options needed to do it, to simplify the proxy API. But, I'm
not strongly opinionated about this.
                
> explore exposing accumulo token in proxy
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-996
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-996
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: proxy
>            Reporter: Keith Turner
>            Assignee: Eric Newton
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> with the new security related changes for 1.5, do the new authentication mechanism need
to be exposed in the proxy?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message