accumulo-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Keith Turner (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-618) Update trace pom to identify artifact as trace and not cloudtrace
Date Fri, 25 Jan 2013 03:31:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13562329#comment-13562329
] 

Keith Turner commented on ACCUMULO-618:
---------------------------------------

bq. Should we also brand that artifact as "accumulo-instamo" and cloudtrace as "accumulo-trace"?

I think accumulo-trace is good.

bq. searching in Maven repositories indicates that the artifacts are associated with the Accumulo
software stack

Hopefully instamo does not end up any maven repos.  Its just meant to serve as an example
accumulo maven project.

                
> Update trace pom to identify artifact as trace and not cloudtrace
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ACCUMULO-618
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-618
>             Project: Accumulo
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: trace
>            Reporter: John Vines
>            Assignee: Christopher Tubbs
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> the trace/pom.xml identfies the artifact as cloudtrace, which is an old convention. We
should update this to be just trace.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message