accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Wall <mjw...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DRAFT] [REPORT] Apache Accumulo - Jan 2019
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2019 17:14:45 GMT
Thanks Keith, thanks Mike. Will modify and send now.

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 6:04 PM Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:

> I suspect the board is not looking for too much detail given all of
> the reports they have to read.  I think adding : "There have been a
> few critical fixes warranting 1.9.3 release soon" would be good.  I
> modified the sentence from an earlier email.
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:42 AM Mike Miller <mmiller@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'd say either 800, 819 or 854 or all of the above.  Basically any that
> > Keith worked on haha.  Maybe he can chose his favorite if you just want
> > one... Keith?
> > https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/854
> > https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/819
> > https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/800
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:29 AM Michael Wall <mjwall@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Mike,
> > >
> > > Perhaps something from
> > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed+label%3Av1.9.3
> > > ?  Any of those you were thinking?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:54 AM Mike Miller <mmiller@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There have been a few critical fixes in 1.9 and 2.0, both warranting
> > > > releases soon.  You could mention something like that in the
> activity.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:49 AM Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 1/7/19 11:26 AM, Michael Wall wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Josh, thanks for reviewing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The "PMC Changes" was copied directly from the
> reporter.apache.org
> > > > > > template.  The "Committer base changes" was in response to
> feedback
> > > > from
> > > > > > the board several reports ago asking if all committers were
PMC
> > > > > members.  I
> > > > > > could say something like "All Committers are also PMC members,
> see
> > > the
> > > > > PMC
> > > > > > Changes section for details".  Is that what you mean by more
> > > explicit?
> > > > > Or
> > > > > > do you mean something else?
> > > > >
> > > > > I had initially thought just copy/paste'ing the text from the PMC
> > > > > additions was good, but, on second thought, suggesting that readers
> > > look
> > > > > at the PMC additions section in the Committer additions section is
> just
> > > > > as good.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the careful attention, Mike!
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message