accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 2.0.0-alpha?
Date Sat, 06 Oct 2018 15:36:37 GMT
I think the benefits of an alpha release can be, and have been,
expressed elsewhere in the internet better than I could do it. But, in
short, an alpha is to solicit feedback from a wider audience, outside
the devs.

In ASF, release candidates are part of the process for making any
release, including an alpha release. So, we'd be voting on RC1 of
2.0.0-alpha. A release candidate can't substitute for a release of any
kind. They serve different purposes. A passing vote would mean that we
can more explicitly share it outside the ASF committers to get the
feedback that an alpha asks for. For example, we can publish the alpha
release to Maven Central and the ASF mirrors, as well as link on our
downloads page.

On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 11:11 AM Mike Miller <> wrote:
> Are there any benefits of having an extra release of alpha versus just
> building a release candidate with extended time for testing?
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 12:27 AM Christopher <> wrote:
> > Hi Accumulo devs,
> >
> > I'm thinking about initiating a vote next week for a 2.0.0-alpha
> > release, so we can have an official ASF release (albeit without the
> > usual stability expectations as a normal release) to be available for
> > the upcoming Accumulo Summit.
> >
> > An alpha version would signal our progress towards 2.0.0 final, serve
> > as a basis for testing, and give us something to share with a wider
> > audience to solicit feedback on the API, configuration, and module
> > changes. Of course, it would still have to meet ASF release
> > requirements... like licensing and stuff, and it should essentially
> > work (so people can actually run tests), but in an alpha release, we
> > could tolerate flaws we wouldn't in a final release.
> >
> > Ideally, I would have preferred a 2.0.0 final at this point in the
> > year, but I think it needs more testing.
> >
> > Does an alpha release next week seem reasonable to you?
> >
> > Christopher
> >

View raw message