accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <els...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Switch to GitHub issues after trial
Date Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:08:02 GMT
On 2/15/18 4:56 PM, Christopher wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:55 PM Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 2/15/18 4:17 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
>>>>> What do we do if the trial is wildly successful? Is there a migration
>>>> plan
>>>>> for our currently open issues? We have almost 1000 of them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> As Keith said in the other thread, we don't need to have all the
>> answers up
>>>> front.
>>>>
>>> You're right, we don't need to have all of the answers up front.
>>> This is one that I'd like to have some thought put into though.
>>>
>>> There's lots of things that are fine to handle as we approach it, but
>> this
>>> one seems like it will lead to us having split issue trackers for_years_
>>> down the road.
>>>
>>
>> This is a good point I hadn't yet considered.
>>
>> There's not only the migration question that eventually needs to be
>> answered, but an immediate question of how will we determine when we can
>> release a version of Accumulo? Are there conventions/features on the GH
>> issues side that will provide some logical analog to the fixVersion of
>> JIRA?
>>
> 
> These are all great questions... that could be answered with a trial...
> 

Shall I assume then that you are volunteering to handle all issue 
management across the disparate systems for all releases?

A trial is a good idea to determine _if we like the system_ and want to 
migrate to it. It's not a substitute for determining if the system is 
_viable_.

Mime
View raw message