accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop3 support target?
Date Mon, 04 Dec 2017 23:12:27 GMT
Agreed.

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:01 PM Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:

> Ah, I'm seeing now -- didn't check my inbox appropriately.
>
> I think the fact that code that we don't own has somehow been allowed to
> be public API is the smell. That's something that needs to be rectified
> sooner than later. By that measure, it can *only* land on Accumulo 2.0
> (which is going to be a major issue for the project).
>
> On 12/4/17 5:58 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> > Sorry, I don't follow. Why do you think 4611/4753 is a show-stopper?
> > Cuz, uh... I made it work already :)
> >
> > Thanks for the JIRA cleanup. Forgot about that one.
> >
> > On 12/4/17 5:55 PM, Christopher wrote:
> >> I don't think we can support it with 1.8 or earlier, because of some
> >> serious incompatibilities (namely, ACCUMULO-4611/4753)
> >> I think people are still patching 1.7, so I don't think we've
> >> "officially"
> >> EOL'd it.
> >> I think 2.0 could require Hadoop 3, if Hadoop 3 is sufficiently stable.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:14 PM Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> What branch do we want to consider Hadoop3 support?
> >>>
> >>> There is a 3.0.0-beta1 release that's been out for a while, and Hadoop
> >>> PMC has already done a 3.0.0 RC0. I think it's the right time to start
> >>> considering this.
> >>>
> >>> In my poking so far, I've filed ACCUMULO-4753 which I'm working through
> >>> now. This does raise the question: where do we want to say we support
> >>> Hadoop3? 1.8 or 2.0? (have we "officially" deprecated 1.7?)
> >>>
> >>> - Josh
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4753
> >>>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message