Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] GitBox
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
References: <CAL4xCsme_3wZAdR83NL99Vu3AAFBUEwtpiwfG30izs=HNUkSRg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFAMeYKfVEVbqFFyr4SuaUhEhmuWL_S5XMXuffzXNVEJ26a26w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org>
Message-ID: <c78d2839-a65e-e367-79e6-53f77948daa9@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 22:30:30 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:56.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/56.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFAMeYKfVEVbqFFyr4SuaUhEhmuWL_S5XMXuffzXNVEJ26a26w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 02:30:35 -0000

My biggest concern was the confusion around the enabling of GH issues 
that would accompany this.

As long as we're not trying to do project management in two places 
concurrently, I don't care either way.

On 8/18/17 4:51 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
> What has changed about the state of Accumulo or GitBox since the last time
> we had this discussion? Not saying no here, curious as to why you think we
> should revisit though.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Mike Walch <mwalch@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> I think we should revisit the discussion of using Apache GitBox for
>> Accumulo. If you are unfamiliar with it, GitBox enables better GitHub
>> integration for Apache projects. With GitBox, committers can label GitHub
>> pull requests, squash and merge them using the GitHub UI, and close them if
>> they become stale. I think a move to GitBox will help us do a better job of
>> reviewing and merging pull requests so that contributions are looked at in
>> a timely manner. The only downside to this move is that the git url for
>> Accumulo will change.
>>
>> Does anyone have objections to this?
>>
>