Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL4xCsme_3wZAdR83NL99Vu3AAFBUEwtpiwfG30izs=HNUkSRg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFAMeYKfVEVbqFFyr4SuaUhEhmuWL_S5XMXuffzXNVEJ26a26w@mail.gmail.com>
 <c78d2839-a65e-e367-79e6-53f77948daa9@apache.org> <CAL5zq9aQ6yFX2Th41Kh_sU75+n4nHbM6gT9GHxqx8N3bCvCRUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <59ef52a4-79b6-4dd5-8d4d-44c68f14d499@apache.org> <CAL5zq9bLYWY2WkSK=HrOZ68FjFW_wKRsqSJudYoos-3Yys1GaQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL5zq9bLYWY2WkSK=HrOZ68FjFW_wKRsqSJudYoos-3Yys1GaQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 20:38:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CAL5zq9YKs0XFKxy33d530MBBrow4nUgpxw+P6pzE06kOUynC9w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] GitBox
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c191c9c8702a1055799eff6"
archived-at: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 20:39:06 -0000

--94eb2c191c9c8702a1055799eff6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14955

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:39 PM Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:

> From the discussion, it seems like we're +2, at least, with no objections
> to work through. So, I'll go ahead and create the INFRA issue to migrate.
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:14 PM Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Ok, cool. Thanks for the clarification and sorry for the ignorance!
>>
>> +0
>>
>> On 8/18/17 10:49 PM, Christopher wrote:
>> > Enabling GH issues is not automatic and would not accompany this
>> change. We
>> > would have to explicitly request that, separately, if we want to do
>> that in
>> > the future.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:30 PM Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> My biggest concern was the confusion around the enabling of GH issues
>> >> that would accompany this.
>> >>
>> >> As long as we're not trying to do project management in two places
>> >> concurrently, I don't care either way.
>> >>
>> >> On 8/18/17 4:51 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
>> >>> What has changed about the state of Accumulo or GitBox since the last
>> >> time
>> >>> we had this discussion? Not saying no here, curious as to why you
>> think
>> >> we
>> >>> should revisit though.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Mike Walch <mwalch@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I think we should revisit the discussion of using Apache GitBox for
>> >>>> Accumulo. If you are unfamiliar with it, GitBox enables better GitHub
>> >>>> integration for Apache projects. With GitBox, committers can label
>> >> GitHub
>> >>>> pull requests, squash and merge them using the GitHub UI, and close
>> >> them if
>> >>>> they become stale. I think a move to GitBox will help us do a better
>> >> job of
>> >>>> reviewing and merging pull requests so that contributions are looked
>> at
>> >> in
>> >>>> a timely manner. The only downside to this move is that the git url
>> for
>> >>>> Accumulo will change.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Does anyone have objections to this?
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

--94eb2c191c9c8702a1055799eff6--