accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] GitBox
Date Sat, 19 Aug 2017 02:49:24 GMT
Enabling GH issues is not automatic and would not accompany this change. We
would have to explicitly request that, separately, if we want to do that in
the future.

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:30 PM Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:

> My biggest concern was the confusion around the enabling of GH issues
> that would accompany this.
>
> As long as we're not trying to do project management in two places
> concurrently, I don't care either way.
>
> On 8/18/17 4:51 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
> > What has changed about the state of Accumulo or GitBox since the last
> time
> > we had this discussion? Not saying no here, curious as to why you think
> we
> > should revisit though.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Mike Walch <mwalch@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> I think we should revisit the discussion of using Apache GitBox for
> >> Accumulo. If you are unfamiliar with it, GitBox enables better GitHub
> >> integration for Apache projects. With GitBox, committers can label
> GitHub
> >> pull requests, squash and merge them using the GitHub UI, and close
> them if
> >> they become stale. I think a move to GitBox will help us do a better
> job of
> >> reviewing and merging pull requests so that contributions are looked at
> in
> >> a timely manner. The only downside to this move is that the git url for
> >> Accumulo will change.
> >>
> >> Does anyone have objections to this?
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message