accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] GitBox
Date Fri, 18 Aug 2017 21:46:46 GMT
I'm a big +1 to using GitBox. I think features far outweigh the one-time
cost of switching the URL of the apache remote.

FWIW, the command to update a remote is:
git remote set-url origin

May also want to update your user name for credential.helper if you're
using that:
git config --global --add credential. ctubbsii

Super easy.

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 4:36 PM Mike Walch <> wrote:

> I think we should revisit the discussion of using Apache GitBox for
> Accumulo. If you are unfamiliar with it, GitBox enables better GitHub
> integration for Apache projects. With GitBox, committers can label GitHub
> pull requests, squash and merge them using the GitHub UI, and close them if
> they become stale. I think a move to GitBox will help us do a better job of
> reviewing and merging pull requests so that contributions are looked at in
> a timely manner. The only downside to this move is that the git url for
> Accumulo will change.
> Does anyone have objections to this?

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message