accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Drob <md...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop 3 and our dependencies generally
Date Thu, 03 Aug 2017 17:30:57 GMT
There is a 3.0.0-alpha4 release currently available as a non-snapshot
version.

I'm not sure it comes with API stability guarantees at all, IIRC the Hadoop
community is planning on providing that for their betas.

Mike

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 from me, too, but I'd like to review what actually changes in master for
> the migration to happen. I don't know much about Hadoop 3. I'm curious what
> the releases will look like (AFAIK, it's only snapshot builds right now; is
> that correct?), how our dependencies will change, and what API stability
> guarantees it offers.
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:59 PM Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 sounds like a good idea to me.
> >
> > On 8/3/17 10:08 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> > > Hi Folks!
> > >
> > > I think we need to start being more formal in planning for Hadoop 3.
> > > They're up to 3.0.0-alpha4 and are pushing towards API-locking
> betas[1].
> > >
> > > What do folks think about starting to push on an Accumulo 2.0 release
> > that
> > > only supports Hadoop 3? It would let us move faster, which we'll need
> to
> > do
> > > if we want to get any API changes in to the Hadoop 3 line.
> > >
> > > If we get started soon we can probably make it parity on beta/GA status
> > > with the Hadoop 3 line. That would give us a beta for Accumulo Summit
> and
> > > GA by end of the year.
> > >
> > > Going to just Hadoop 3+ would also be a sufficient dependency break
> that
> > we
> > > could do a pass updating any lagging dependencies to latest major
> > version.
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/Hadoop+3.0.0+release
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message