accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <els...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] GitBox
Date Sat, 19 Aug 2017 03:13:58 GMT
Ok, cool. Thanks for the clarification and sorry for the ignorance!

+0

On 8/18/17 10:49 PM, Christopher wrote:
> Enabling GH issues is not automatic and would not accompany this change. We
> would have to explicitly request that, separately, if we want to do that in
> the future.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:30 PM Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> My biggest concern was the confusion around the enabling of GH issues
>> that would accompany this.
>>
>> As long as we're not trying to do project management in two places
>> concurrently, I don't care either way.
>>
>> On 8/18/17 4:51 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
>>> What has changed about the state of Accumulo or GitBox since the last
>> time
>>> we had this discussion? Not saying no here, curious as to why you think
>> we
>>> should revisit though.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Mike Walch <mwalch@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think we should revisit the discussion of using Apache GitBox for
>>>> Accumulo. If you are unfamiliar with it, GitBox enables better GitHub
>>>> integration for Apache projects. With GitBox, committers can label
>> GitHub
>>>> pull requests, squash and merge them using the GitHub UI, and close
>> them if
>>>> they become stale. I think a move to GitBox will help us do a better
>> job of
>>>> reviewing and merging pull requests so that contributions are looked at
>> in
>>>> a timely manner. The only downside to this move is that the git url for
>>>> Accumulo will change.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have objections to this?
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

Mime
View raw message