accumulo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From keith-turner <...@git.apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] accumulo pull request #176: Wrote blog post about durability and performance
Date Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:46:48 GMT
Github user keith-turner commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/176#discussion_r85752895
  
    --- Diff: _posts/blog/2016-10-28-durability-performance.md ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
    +---
    +title: "Durability Performance Implications"
    +date: 2016-10-28 17:00:00 +0000
    +author: Keith Turner
    --- End diff --
    
    I was thinking it would be nice to add another optional field: `reviewers`.   For Fluo
we decided not have an author field because the post were a community effort. As is the case
here, review always made the post so much better.  I am thinking a different way to solve
this than Fluo did is to add a reviewer field.  Unless someone objects, I can add handling
for that in the template in this PR.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Mime
View raw message