Mailing-List: contact dev-help@accumulo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <57B1EBD7.8000000@gmail.com>
References: <57B1EBD7.8000000@gmail.com>
From: Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:25:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGHyZ6KptLNj_iB+2n4sks-+Ojx5J2ye-VX-FY6s8S4_tLKn_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Change in out-of-the-box log file naming after ACCUMULO-4328
To: "dev@accumulo apache. org" <dev@accumulo.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
archived-at: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:26:18 -0000

This is definitely the kind of operational change that needs a release
note. Are we tracking those on the JIRAs that introduce them, or
somewhere else?

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the default log file names for Accumulo services has changed
> (I'm assuming after ACCUMULO-4328)
>
> [accumulo@jelser-accumulo-180-2 accumulo-1.8.0]$ ll logs/
> total 188700
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo  17887094 Aug 15 16:13
> gc_1_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.debug.log
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo  11183781 Aug 15 16:12
> gc_1_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.log
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo         0 Aug 14 02:50
> gc_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.err.1
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo         0 Aug 14 02:50
> gc_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.out.1
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo         0 Aug 14 01:20
> jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.audit
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo 158246309 Aug 15 16:13
> master_1_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.debug.log
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo   2157925 Aug 15 16:13
> master_1_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.log
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo         0 Aug 15 16:13
> master_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.err
> -rw-rw-r--. 1 accumulo accumulo         0 Aug 15 16:13
> master_jelser-accumulo-180-2.openstacklocal.out
>
> (note the extra "_1")
>
> IMO, this is an unnecessary change (if I only run one tserver, why are the
> log file names different?), but I'm not presently of the opinion that this
> is a blocker. I just noticed this because of the two different file-naming
> schemes in this directory. I wanted to make sure it was mentioned in case
> someone had a clear case why this may break downstream (e.g. another system
> that would require changes to parse these log names).
>
> Now that I think about it some more, I'm not sure why I don't have "_1"'s
> included in the .out/.err files too. Maybe that is a bug? Is that something
> you recall testing, Dave?
>
> - Josh


-- 
busbey